Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 86.6 score against 77. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is newer and just a little thinner than LG G7 Fit's, but it's a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy A50s features just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM. LG G7 Fit has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a quite bigger memory for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.