Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than LG G7 Fit, getting a general score of 85.5 against 77. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy A51's construction has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it is a little bit heavier. Galaxy A51 features a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A51 also has more cores.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater display density. Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low light situations.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A51 features superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.