Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is newer than the LG G7 Fit's, although it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
LG G7 Fit features a brighter display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures, a way better resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.