Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than LG G7 Fit. Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM.
LG G7 Fit features a sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes greater pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.