Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is a lot newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture, a way larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and a lot higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.