Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than the Galaxy A6, with a general score of 77 against 75.8. Even though the LG G7 Fit and Galaxy A6 were released only 6 months apart, the LG G7 Fit construction is just a little bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than Galaxy A6. The LG G7 Fit counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot better pixel density, a little larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG G7 Fit features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 Fit captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a much tinier aperture and a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a 16 MP camera in the back, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much better (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A6's battery life is just as good as the LG G7 Fit one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.