Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has an overall score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s overall score of 75.8. LG G7 Fit's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although they are slower).
The LG G7 Fit counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher screen density. LG G7 Fit captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
LG G7 Fit counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features improved battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.