Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. LG G7 Fit is a lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A70, but they are 0.31inches thick. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 Fit has newer 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory. LG G7 Fit features a lot better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 Fit has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in low-light environments and a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A70 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A70 features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.