Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than LG G7 Fit, having a 92.9 score against 77. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG G7 Fit has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures greater videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.