Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has a score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A8 (2018) design is older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the LG G7 Fit. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) also has 4 more processing cores.
The LG G7 Fit features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a bit bigger display, a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG G7 Fit features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s battery lifetime is just as good as LG G7 Fit's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.