Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than LG G7 Fit, with an 85.2 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier. The LG G7 Fit has a much sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher pixel number per display inch.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots clearer photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a way bigger aperture and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has greater battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.