Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C7 Pro is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, having a score of 78.4 against 77. Galaxy C7 Pro is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Galaxy C7 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The LG G7 Fit takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution. The LG G7 Fit counts with a better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.