Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. Galaxy F62's design is extremely newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much brighter display.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.