Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 97.6 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is newer and thinner, but noticeably heavier than LG G7 Fit. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
LG G7 Fit features a much better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher screen density and a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Galaxy Fold has a bit better processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Fold has just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Fold features a much better storage for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.