Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J8, with a 77 score against 76.7. The LG G7 Fit design is a little thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy J8, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10 version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy J8, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a lot higher pixels density. LG G7 Fit features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy J8 and LG G7 Fit have very similar processing units, and although the Galaxy J8 has 4 more cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy J8 counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG G7 Fit has a little bit better camera than Galaxy J8, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video and a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.