Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a global score of 78.9 against 77. Although it's the best device we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy M20 body is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than LG G7 Fit. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a processor that is just as good as LG G7 Fit's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a higher number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. LG G7 Fit has a much better looking display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The LG G7 Fit has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG G7 Fit features a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.32 inches back camera sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a much higher video resolution and a higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.