Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 82.4 score against 77. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version, providing a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy M30's construction is heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG G7 Fit.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit features an incredibly better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G7 Fit has just a bit better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have a same size sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a more mega pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features a better storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy M30 has a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.