Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 563 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than the LG G7 Fit, having an 87.7 score against 77. The Galaxy M51 body is newer, but much heavier and thicker than the LG G7 Fit. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. LG G7 Fit features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a greater memory for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy M51 takes much better photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a much better resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.