Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the LG G7 Fit, having a overall score of 98.9 against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores. LG G7 Fit counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a little bit better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.