Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, having a overall score of 81.2 against 77. Despite being the best phone in this review, it must be told that it's also noticeably older, just a little heavier and just a bit thicker. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy Note 3 has just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a GPU. LG G7 Fit features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a little bigger display and more pixels per screen inch.
LG G7 Fit shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back. The LG G7 Fit has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.