Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit, with a score of 79.3 against 77. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy Note 5 is a incredibly older and a little heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, but Samsung was able to make it just a little thinner anyway.
The LG G7 Fit has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a bit bigger display, a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG G7 Fit has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG G7 Fit also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy Note 5 has a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
LG G7 Fit features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5's battery performance is just as good as the LG G7 Fit one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.