Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note3 has the older 4.4.2 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy Note3 is a way older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit.
Galaxy Note3 has a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Quad-Core processor. LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a little bigger screen.
The LG G7 Fit features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.