Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 80.2 score against 77. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older and a little bit heavier than LG G7 Fit, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. The LG G7 Fit features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a little bit higher pixel density and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also has a greater number of cores. Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a back camera with a 16 megapixels, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note5 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG G7 Fit counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 Fit and the Galaxy Note5 count with similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.