Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 79.5 against 77. The Galaxy Note7 body has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it's a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a processing unit that is very similar to the LG G7 Fit one, both of them have a Quad-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
LG G7 Fit has a much better display than Galaxy Note7, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit larger display. LG G7 Fit has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture and a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.