Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than the LG G7 Fit, with a general score of 88.3 against 77. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy S10 is a a bit heavier device than the LG G7 Fit, but both have the same thickness.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM. LG G7 Fit counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG G7 Fit also has a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a lot bigger aperture to take better low light photos.
The Galaxy S10 has a better memory for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.