Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, having a 94.8 score against 77. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but both of them are equally thin.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a just a little worse display density. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S20 has a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Samsung Galaxy S20 has better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.