Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than LG G7 Fit, getting a 98 score against 77. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is newer than the LG G7 Fit's, although it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
LG G7 Fit features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more MP back-facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.