Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a score of 89.1, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a a bit heavier phone than the LG G7 Fit, but they are 0.31inches thick. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit has a much better display than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G7 Fit features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a much better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE takes clearer photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.