Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting a general score of 82.6 against 77. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a notably lighter and thinner cellphone than LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM. LG G7 Fit and Galaxy S25 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy S25 has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a way brighter display and a quite larger screen.
The LG G7 Fit has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much larger sensor, a lot better video resolution, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy S25 features greater battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.