Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, getting a 79.5 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a a little bit lighter device than LG G7 Fit, but both of them are equally thin. The LG G7 Fit features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a little worse pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a little bit brighter display and a larger display.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a little faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S7 has a camera that is very similar to LG G7 Fit's camera, because although the Galaxy S7 has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a way bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
LG G7 Fit features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit and Samsung Galaxy S7 feature similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.