Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. LG G7 Fit is a extremely newer device, and it is also noticeably thinner and lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a much brighter display and a larger display.
LG G7 Fit and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active both have really similar processing units, both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG G7 Fit has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33% greater battery size. LG G7 Fit features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a back camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.