Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, having a 78.1 score against 77. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy S7 edge is a notably older and just a little heavier cellphone than LG G7 Fit, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway.
LG G7 Fit features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a bit bigger display. LG G7 Fit has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Quad-Core processor. Galaxy S7 edge's camera is just as good as LG G7 Fit's camera, because although the Galaxy S7 edge has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and a lot bigger aperture.
The Galaxy S7 edge has superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.