Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's noticeably heavier and extremely thicker.
LG G7 Fit counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel density. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and LG G7 Fit both have really similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much smaller camera sensor capturing way worse quality images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a lot better 25 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.