Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than LG G7 Fit, having an 88.5 score against 77. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and a little bit thinner device than LG G7 Fit, although it's also heavier.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit more memory to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.