Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the LG G7 Fit, getting an 85.6 score against 77. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is heavier than the LG G7 Fit, it's thinner and also a lot newer.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. LG G7 Fit has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G7 Fit features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 Fit counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.