Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a little thinner phone than LG G7 Fit, but it is somewhat heavier.
LG G7 Fit has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more powerful processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.