Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than LG G7 Fit, it's thinner and newer. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.