Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and thinner than LG G7 Fit's, although it is notably heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater display density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The LG G7 Fit shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the LG G7 Fit also has a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.