Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black Shadow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 general score. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is notably thinner but notably heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a much smaller display and way more opaque display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a way higher resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.