Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is thicker and a lot heavier.
LG G7 Fit counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more brightness, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch of display. The LG G7 Fit features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.