Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is newer, but thicker and notably heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has just a bit better performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a larger number of cores (and faster). LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.