Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 77 against 76.6. LG G7 Fit's design has the same thickness than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but it's lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 Fit has the older 8.1 Oreo version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit superior processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM. LG G7 Fit features a brighter display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater screen density.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more memory for apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Quad HD / 2K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a much bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.