Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-08-28 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than LG G7 One, getting a general score of 77.7 against 76.8. Despite being the best we compare here, the HTC One M9 construction is way older, a little bit heavier and thicker than LG G7 One. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and LG G7 One has Android 10.
HTC One M9 has a little faster CPU than LG G7 One, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG G7 One, although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better camera than LG G7 One, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the HTC One M9 also counts with a back camera with more mega pixels and a way larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
LG G7 One counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 One also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 One features a bit longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.