Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-28 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 One is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 76.8 score against 75.8. LG G7 One is a notably newer device, and it is also notably thinner and lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The LG G7 One counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG G7 One also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better looking screen than LG G7 One, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixels density. The LG G7 One counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG G7 One also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 One counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG G7 One also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light situations and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has greater battery life than LG G7 One, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.