Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 563 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 One's overall score of 76.8. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the LG G7 One, it's extremely thicker and way heavier. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and LG G7 One has Android 10, providing some extra features and performance tweaks.
LG G7 One counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG G7 One counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 One counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro and LG G7 One have extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos or videos in low-light environments and a much tinier sensor capturing lot worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a way better battery duration than LG G7 One, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.