Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than LG G7 One, getting a global score of 94.6 against 76.8. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and somewhat thinner than the LG G7 One's, although it's also noticeably heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and LG G7 One has Android 10 version, so it provides you some extra features and performance improvements.
LG G7 One has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a way greater display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit superior processor than LG G7 One, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than LG G7 One, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 One, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery duration than LG G7 One, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.