Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. Although LG G7 ThinQ is heavier than the Google Pixel, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. LG G7 ThinQ has a sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a larger display.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster). LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a much more MP camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.