Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a score of 82.5 against 81. Google Pixel 2 XL's body has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it's a little bit heavier. LG G7 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger display. The LG G7 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate, a way more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 XL features longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 17% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.