Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, with a global score of 81 against 78.8. The LG G7 ThinQ is an older and a bit heavier device than Google Pixel 3a, but LG was able to build it a little thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better pixel quantity in each screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 3a's battery life is just as good as LG G7 ThinQ's battery lifetime.
The LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Google Pixel 3a, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.