Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with a global score of 81 against 78.9. Even though the LG G7 ThinQ is older than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's body is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it offers some extra features.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite larger display, a better pixels number in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate, a camera with a much higher 16 MP resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL features longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.